“ We cannot expect for Thackeray, we cannot even desire for him, a popularity like that of Dickens. If ever any man wrote for the people, it was Dickens. Where can we find such a benefactor, and who has lightened so many lives with such merriment as he? But Thackeray wrote, like the mass of authors, for the literary class—for all who have the sense of style, the delight in the best language. He will endure while English literature endures, while English civilisation lasts. We cannot expect all the world to share our affection for this humourist whose mirth springs from his melancholy. ”
Andrew Lang
Summary
Essays in Little (Andrew Lang, 1886) is a collection of literary reflections exploring the interplay between prose, verse, and the enduring legacies of authors such as Dickens, Thackeray, Dumas, and Homer. Lang examines the distinct attractions of novelists and poets, contrasting Dickens’ populism with Thackeray’s refined style, while celebrating the timeless resonance of classical stories.
Through sharp analysis and vivid commentary, the essays dissect genius, the reader’s role, and the moral and aesthetic dimensions of literature, framing art as both a mirror and a battleground for human experience. Lang’s work underscores the tension between fleeting trends and the immortality of great writing.
Quotes from Essays in Little (Andrew Lang)
“ In all he does, at his best, as in the “Chevalier d’Harmenthal,” he has movement, kindness, courage, and gaiety. His philosophy of life is that old philosophy of the sagas and of Homer. Let us enjoy the movement of the fray, the faces of fair women, the taste of good wine; let us welcome life like a mistress, let us welcome death like a friend, and with a jest—if death comes with honour.Dumas is no pessimist. “Heaven has made but one drama for man—the world,” he writes, “and during these three thousand years mankind has been hissing it.” ”
“ They hurry on with the adventures, and do not stop to ask what the moralisings mean. They forgive the humour of Kingsley because it is well meant. They get, in short, the real good of this really great and noble and manly and blundering genius. They take pleasure in his love of strong men, gallant fights, desperate encounters with human foes, with raging seas, with pestilence, or in haunted forests. For in all that is good of his talent—in his courage, his frank speech, his love of sport, his clear eyes, his devotion to field and wood, river, moor, sea, and storms—Kingsley is a boy. ”
