Summary

Bernard Keisch The Mysterious Box: Nuclear Science and Art

For one or more paintings, Van Meegeren did so well that, in spite of all this evidence, a few people still weren’t convinced that these paintings were painted by Van Meegeren and not by Vermeer.”
Bill, who by this time was bursting with questions, interrupted, “You mean they still aren’t sure about some of those paintings after 25 years? Aren’t there better ways of telling whether a painting is genuine or not? You’re a scientist. Can’t scientists like you do something about it now?”
Source: Gutenberg

Bernard Keisch The Mysterious Box: Nuclear Science and Art

During the last several years, scientists have developed extremely sensitive methods of analysis, which have been applied to all kinds of problems.
“One such method is called neutron activation analysis. In this method these small amounts of impurities can be detected in tiny samples of material. This is quite important because only very small samples can be taken from a precious painting without damaging it. 25 Normally, a scientist or an art restorer takes samples that are no bigger than the head of a pin.”
Source: Gutenberg

Bernard Keisch The Mysterious Box: Nuclear Science and Art

In the first place, this method works only in certain cases of suspected forgery. Over the last 50 or 100 years, a number of paintings have turned up that seemed, even to the best art experts, to be several hundred years old. Some of these were genuine, and some were painted by forgers who could not resist the high prices paid for works of art. The National Gallery of Art, in Washington, D. C., thinking that there might be a way of detecting these forgeries, gave its support to a group of scientists who developed a method for this purpose.
Source: Gutenberg

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature