Henry Faul

Summary

Henry Faul,  Nuclear Clocks

“ If any one nucleus of a given ISOTOPE is stable, then all others are also stable, because what is true for one atom of a given kind is true for all others of the same kind. [5]
Some nuclides, both man-made and natural, are unstable, however. Their nuclei are in such violent turmoil that the nuclear forces cannot always hold them together, and various bits and pieces fly off. If we were to try to predict when one particular unstable nucleus would thus disintegrate, however, we could not succeed, because the instant any specific decay (or disintegration) event will occur is a matter of chance.
”
Source: Gutenberg

Henry Faul,  Nuclear Clocks

“ We can think of the nucleus of an atom as a sort of drop—a bunch of NEUTRONS and PROTONS held together by very strong short-range forces. These elementary particles within a nucleus are not arranged in any fixed or rigid array, but are free to move about within the grip of these forces. These motions may be quite violent, but for most NUCLIDES found in nature, the nuclear forces are powerful enough to keep everything confined; thus the nuclei of these atoms hold together, and are said to be stable. ”
Source: Gutenberg

Henry Faul,  Nuclear Clocks

“ When we find a piece of charcoal in a cave or a piece of wood in some ancient structure, for example, we can measure the amount of carbon in it, determine how much of it is 14C, and then calculate back to the time when the radioactivity from the 14C was the same as we now find in living wood. In other words, if we assume that we know from the observed secular equilibrium how much 14C originally was present in living material, then we can calculate the time of death of any similar but ancient material. ”
Source: Gutenberg

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature