Summary

David Patrick Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition (1878)

But there are many reasons to show why, in the 17th century, men should have set themselves with a new zeal, in politics, law, and theology, to follow the light of nature alone, and to cast aside, to the utmost of their ability, the fetters of tradition and prescriptive right, of positive codes, and scholastic systems, and why in England especially there should, amongst numerous free-thinkers, have been not a few free writers. The significance of the Copernican system, as the total overthrow of the traditional conception of the universe, dawned on all educated men.
Source: Wikisource

David Patrick Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition (1878)

Even now, between scientific atheism and speculative agnosticism on the one hand and church orthodoxy on the other, many seem to cling to a theology nearly allied to deism. Rejecting miracles and denying the infallibility of Scripture, protesting against Calvinistic views of sovereign grace and having no interest in evangelical Arminianism, the faith of such inquirers seems fairly to coincide with that of the deists. Wherever religious indifferentism is rife, the less generous forms of deism are still alive.
Source: Wikisource

David Patrick Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition (1878)

The term deism is not only used to signify the main body of the deists teaching, or the tendency they represent, but has of late especially come into use as a technical term for one specific metaphysical doctrine as to the relation of God to the universe, assumed to have been characteristic of the deists, and to have distinguished them from atheists, pantheists, and theists, the belief, namely, that the first cause of the universe is a personal God, but is not only distinct from the world but apart from it and its concerns.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature