Summary

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Beauharnais v. Illinois — Opinion of the Court

Every power may be abused, but the possibility of abuse is a poor reason for denying Illinois the power to adopt measures against criminal libels sanctioned by centuries of Anglo-American law. 'While this Court sits' it retains and exercises authority to nullify action which encroaches on freedom of utterance under the guise of punishing libel.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Beauharnais v. Illinois — Opinion of the Court

It is not within our competence to confirm or deny claims of social scientists as to the dependence of the individual on the position of his racial or religious group in the community. It would, however, be arrant dogmatism, quite outside the scope of our authority in passing on the powers of a State, for us to deny that the Illinois Legislature may warrantably believe that a man's job and his educational opportunities and the dignity accorded him may depend as much on the reputation of the racial and religious group to which he willy-nilly belongs, as on his own merits.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Beauharnais v. Illinois — Opinion of the Court

No one will gainsay that it is libelous falsely to charge another with being a rapist, robber, carrier of knives and guns, and user of marijuana. The precise question before us, then, is whether the protection of 'liberty' in the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prevents a State from punishing such libels-as criminal libel has been defined, limited and constitutionally recognized time out of mind-directed at designated collectivities and flagrantly disseminated.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature