Summary

Portrait of Hugh H. Bownes Hugh H. Bownes Timothy W. v. Rochester, New Hampshire School District…

We must recognize our responsibility to provide education for all children which meets their unique needs. The denial of the right to education and to equal opportunity within this Nation for handicapped children -- whether it be outright exclusion from school, the failure to provide an education which meets the needs of a single handicapped child, or the refusal to recognize the handicapped child's right to grow -- is a travesty of justice and a denial of equal protection of the law.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugh H. Bownes Hugh H. Bownes Timothy W. v. Rochester, New Hampshire School District…

The law explicitly recognizes that education for the severely handicapped is to be broadly defined, to include not only traditional academic skills, but also basic functional life skills, and that educational methodologies in these areas are not static, but are constantly evolving and improving. It is the school district's responsibility to avail itself of these new approaches in providing an education program geared to each child's individual needs.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugh H. Bownes Hugh H. Bownes Timothy W. v. Rochester, New Hampshire School District…

We conclude that the Act's language dictates the holding that Timothy W. is a handicapped child who is in need of special education and related services because of his handicaps. He must, therefore, according to the Act, be provided with such an educational program. There is nothing in the Act's language which even remotely supports the district court's conclusion that "under [the Act] , an initial determination as to a child's ability to benefit from special education, must be made in order for a handicapped child to qualify for education under the Act."
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature