Hutcheson Macaulay Posnett

Summary

Hutcheson Macaulay Posnett Comparative Literature (1886)

When the muse of Menander was thus uttering the last notes of that dramatic song which had risen from Athens at the birth of her literature, the separation of philosophy and science from the spirit of literary creation had been established. Science, which, save in its infancy, refuses to be the citizen of any peculiar State and rapidly grows into the cosmopolitan questioner of Nature and Humanity, had thrown off the pleasing form of Athenian conversation, so brilliantly assumed by the world-wide thought of Plato, and in Aristotle had settled down into a dry-as-dust collector of facts.
Source: Wikisource

Hutcheson Macaulay Posnett Comparative Literature (1886)

The life of the ode is ideal, that of the epic grandiose, that of the drama real. In fine, this triple poetry springs from three grand sources—the Bible, Homer, Shakspere. Such are the diverse aspects of thought at different eras of man and society. Here are its three faces—youth, manhood, old age. Examine a single literature by itself or all literatures en masse, and you will always reach the same fact—the lyric poets before the epic, the epic before the dramatic.
Source: Wikisource

Hutcheson Macaulay Posnett Comparative Literature (1886)

Here was a reservoir for literature; and, if literature were really of artificial making and not the outflow of social life, this famous Alexandrian library should have made up for the stagnant shallows into which the living streams of old Greek society had now spread out. But though a library may produce excellent grammarians, critics, scientists, it can do little for literature as distinct from science and criticism. It cannot make imagination live or change the dry skeletons of analysis into creatures of flesh and blood.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature