John Wesley Etheridge

Summary

John Wesley Etheridge The Syrian Churches (1846)

When Nestorius promulgated his doctrine of two persons in the Redeemer, he had not a more zealous antagonist than Eutyches, an archimandrite of a monastery of three hundred monks, near Constantinople. But while prosecuting his opposition to that erroneous dogma, Eutyches himself was carried away by a too common tendency of our nature to run into extremes, and became, in his own turn, the author and advocate of a new heresy. In contending for the oneness of the person of Christ, he began to teach that the two natures in that one person were so blended as to have become one nature
Source: Wikisource

John Wesley Etheridge The Syrian Churches (1846)

They think, that, in the incarnation, from two natures there resulted one. In other words, they believe that the Redeemer does not possess two natures, but one, composed of two: (ex duabus naturis, non in duabus; id est, ex duabus in unum coalescentibus, non duabus remanentibus:) illustrating their dogma in this way,—"Glass is made of sand; but the whole is only glass, no longer sand: thus, the divine nature of Christ has absorbed the human, so as that the two are become one."
Source: Wikisource

John Wesley Etheridge The Syrian Churches (1846)

For some time it was forbidden to a Jew to enter Jerusalem, or even to look at it from a distance. It was inhabited wholly by Gentiles. Upon the gate that led towards Bethlehem stood the marble image of a sow; and, as the Christians were not less hated than the Jews, Adrian ordered an idol of Jupiter to be set up on the site of the Resurrection of our Lord, and another of Venus upon the hill of Calvary.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature