Summary

Max Planck Translation:The Measurements of Kaufmann (1906)

After I had recognized that the existing theories, including mine, do not meet the requirements, I have asked me the question, if it is possible to be consistent with experience while keeping Maxwell's equations and the principle of equality of action and reaction. This is possible when we rely on the following principle: the ponderomotive force between two systems in relative uniform motion to each other, by consideration of the sign, is the force calculated from the Maxwell-Lorentz equations acting upon a system which is arbitrarily regarded as at rest.
Source: Wikisource

Max Planck Translation:The Measurements of Kaufmann (1906)

Planck: Abraham is right when he says the main advantage of the sphere theory would be that it would be a purely electrical theory. If this were feasible that would be very nice, for now it is only a postulate. The Lorentz-Einstein theory is based on a postulate, namely that no absolute translation can be demonstrated. It seems that the two postulates can not be united, and now it depends on which postulate is to be preferred. That of Lorentz is more sympathetic to me. It's probably the best thing when work continues in both areas and the experiments eventually give the decision.
Source: Wikisource

Max Planck Translation:The Measurements of Kaufmann (1906)

Various theories. The relation between the electric deflection and the magnetic deflection is due to the dependence of momentum p on the velocity q, and this is given by the expression of the kinetic potential H as a function of q, which is different for various theories. I have performed the calculations only for those two theories, which are the most developed today: that of Abraham, [6] in which the electron has the form of a rigid sphere, and that of Lorentz-Einstein, [7] in which the "principle of relativity" possesses exact validity.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature