Paul D. Bunker

Summary

Paul D. Bunker,  Post Exchange Methods

“ One authority goes so far as to say,—“If a check bears no evidence as to its purpose but can readily be identified with a particular bill or invoice, it still is a better voucher than a receipted bill, ... a mere receipt for so much money, which can readily be forged, is poor evidence of a legitimate payment, but a paid check, properly endorsed and otherwise identified as representing a definite liability, is pretty fair proof that the money has reached the creditors.” ”
Source: Gutenberg

Paul D. Bunker,  Post Exchange Methods

“ The objection may be made to this system that in a large exchange it would require the services of one clerk to keep the stock records alone, but when we realize that an inefficient stock record can and usually does result in losses that are sometimes much greater in value than this clerk’s wages, we see the futility of such an argument. It is useless to try to avoid the conclusion that we must keep accurate track of our merchandise. In an exchange at, say, a 5-company post, it is economy to pay one man $100.00 per month or even more, to take exclusive charge of the stock records. ”
Source: Gutenberg

Paul D. Bunker,  Post Exchange Methods

“ In departments where there can be but two different kinds of sales, say charge and cash, a machine without the movable clutch can be used.
A modern development of the cash register is the “Slip Printing” device. By this, we mean the printing of the amount of sale on the sales slip itself, instead of on the “chop ticket”. In our system of recording charge sales, where the customer is given a copy of the sales slip, it is unnecessary for him to have the chop ticket, too, but it is necessary for us to know that his sales slip calls for the same amount that has been rung up on the register.
”
Source: Gutenberg

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature