Rudolf von Jhering

Summary

Rudolf von Jhering The Struggle for Law — Chapter VI (1872)

How deeply humbled we should feel at seeing that the thought, so simple, just, and so much in harmony with the true feeling of legal right, that, in every legal right, be its object only a watch, one’s person and all his rights are attacked, had vanished from the law to such an extent that the sacrifice of one’s rights and the cowardly flight from injustice could be raised to the dignity of a duty. Can we wonder that cowardice and the apathetic endurance of injustice were the character of our national history at a time when science dared to enunciate such doctrines?
Source: Wikisource

Rudolf von Jhering The Struggle for Law — Chapter VI (1872)

Let us congratulate ourselves that we live in very different times. Such theories are impossible in our days. They can thrive only in the swamp through which a nation, rotten alike from a political point of view and from the point of view of law, drags itself along.
This theory of cowardice, of the obligation of sacrificing our imperiled rights, is the most direct opposite of the theory which I have advocated, that the courageous battle for one’s legal rights is a strict duty.
Source: Wikisource

Rudolf von Jhering The Struggle for Law — Chapter VI (1872)

We might expect to find in it the marks of despotism, severity, harshness, want of consideration, and yet we find the very opposite—mildness and humanity. But this mildness itself is a despotic mildness, that is, it robs one person of what it gives another—it is the mildness of arbitrariness and caprice, not that of humanity—it is the penalty of cruelty.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature