“ No one can possibly be more interested in the prosperity of the railroads than the railroad employes. From every dollar earned by the railroad forty-two cents go directly to pay wages of railway employes, while only twenty-one cents, or one-half that amount, go to pay interest and dividends. In no other country in the world does the railroad employe get so large a share and the security holder so little. Why should not the man who invests his money in railroad stock receive as much return in shape of dividends as the man who invests his in a farm or factory? ”
Summary
The Railway Library, 1909, an anonymous treatise published in the United States, examines the economic and regulatory environment of American railroads during a period of rapid industrial growth. Focusing on themes such as freight traffic, passenger rates, and the Interstate Commerce Commission’s role, the text explores tensions between railroad workers, investors, and the public.
It critiques the differences in financial returns between labor and shareholders while addressing the inherent challenges of competition versus monopoly in transportation. Through analyses of cost-of-living debates, labor conflicts, and the political contradictions of railway regulation, the work highlights the railroad’s essential role as the backbone of national industry, emphasizing that its success is deeply tied to the broader economic well-being of the United States.
Quotes from The Railway Library, 1909 ()
“ Now there is nothing in the whole wilderness of economics so utterly illusive and misleading as this same cost of living. It is as incapable of statistical expression as the airy imaginings of a dream and yet it broods over the domestic happiness of nations [330] with all the disquieting effects of a nightmare—and like every nightmare it comes from eating too much and wanting to eat more.In economics, beyond the barest subsistence, the cost of living is not ruled by necessity but by individual choice. Each person and family settles it along the lines of abstinence or indulgence. ”
“ I have endeavored to sketch briefly what should be the attitude of the railway man as a railway man toward the public. I am sure I voice the sentiment of all managing railroad officers when I say that our great desire is to please the public and to give it the best possible service for the least possible compensation consistent with reason. Discriminations have long since passed away and nobody is better pleased than the railroad man that it is so. There is no desire to escape either responsibility or regulation. We desire to accord only justice and we ask in return only justice. ”
