Summary

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark United States v. Seeger — Opinion of the Court

We have concluded that Congress, in using the expression 'Supreme Being' rather than the designation 'God,' was merely clarifying the meaning of religious training and belief so as to embrace all religions and to exclude essentially political, sociological, or philosophical views. We believe that under this construction, the test of belief 'in a relation to a Supreme Being' is whether a given belief that is sincere and meaningful occupies a place in the life of its possessor parallel to that filled by the orthodox belief in God of one who clearly qualifies for the exemption.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark United States v. Seeger — Opinion of the Court

But we hasten to emphasize that while the 'truth' of a belief is not open to question, there remains the significant question whether it is 'truly held.' This is the threshold question of sincerity which must be resolved in every case. It is, of course, a question of fact-a prime consideration to the validity of every claim for exemption as a conscientious objector.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature