Summary

Portrait of William Cranch William Cranch Stettinius v. United States — opinion (1839)

It is true that the court cannot control the jury in giving their verdict, nor compel them to find a special verdict. The only remedy for a verdict contrary to law, is a new trial; for no appeal or writ of error lies from the verdict of a jury; but for a general verdict of not guilty, upon the general issue, in a criminal case, there is no remedy; for the process of attaint is now obsolete in England, and, we believe, never has been resorted to in this country
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William Cranch William Cranch Stettinius v. United States — opinion (1839)

Even when an issue in fact is joined, and comes before a jury for trial, either party, by demurring to the evidence, which includes an admission of the fact to which the evidence applies, may, so far, draw the cause from the cognizance of the jury, for, in that case the law is reserved for the decision of the court from which the issue of fact comes
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature