Summary

William Cunningham The Progress of Economic Doctrine in England in the Eighteenth Century (1891)

National prosperity and relative superiority were vague and difiicult notions, but when the whole discussion was made to turn on wealth, the treatment seemed to be more concrete and definite, and it took hold upon the public mind.
There were of course some economists who never really adapted their habits of thought in accordance with Adam Smith's principles. Playfair speaks of him with respect, but he continued to draw his beautiful diagrams of the Balance of Trade, as if he still thought it furnished a criterion of something.
Source: Wikisource

William Cunningham The Progress of Economic Doctrine in England in the Eighteenth Century (1891)

Men were expected to carry on their trade in a public-spirited fashion and not to regard their private lucre; but in the eighteenth century the force of self-interest was recognized as a power that was rather indifferent than hostile to the public good, so that it seemed as if a very moderate amount of direction might be brought to bear, and thus induce men who were guided by self-interest alone to carry on their business in a manner that accorded with public prosperity.
Source: Wikisource

William Cunningham The Progress of Economic Doctrine in England in the Eighteenth Century (1891)

National rivalries and national power are but mean things after all; but till the study of wealth was dissociated from these lower aims, it was hardly possible to investigate empirically how we could make the most of the resources of the world as a whole, and how material goods might be best applied for the service of man. It is owing to Adam Smith and the manner in which he severed economics from politics that we can raise and dismiss, even if we cannot solve, such problems to-day.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature