Ignatius of Antioch

Definition and stakes

Portrait of W. D. Killen W. D. Killen,  The Ignatian Epistles Entirely Spurious…

“ The question of the genuineness of the Epistles attributed to Ignatius of Antioch has continued to awaken interest ever since the period of the Reformation. That great religious revolution gave an immense impetus to the critical spirit; and when brought under the light of its examination, not a few documents, the claims of which had long passed unchallenged, were summarily pronounced spurious. Eusebius, writing in the fourth century, names only seven letters as attributed to Ignatius ”
Source: Gutenberg

Portrait of W. D. Killen W. D. Killen,  The Ignatian Epistles Entirely Spurious…

“ This is, however, the very first point to be proved; and the bishop has been labouring throughout to make good a foregone conclusion. No wonder that the result should be unsatisfactory. If he has built on a false foundation, nothing else could be expected. There is not, we are satisfied, a particle of solid evidence to show that Ignatius of Antioch left behind him any writings whatever. This may be deemed a very bold statement, but it is deliberately advanced. ”
Source: Gutenberg

Portrait of Ignatius of Antioch Ignatius of Antioch,  Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol.I Ignatius… (1885)

“ Thus said Lardner, in his Credibility of the Gospel History (1743) : “have carefully compared the two editions, and am very well satisfied, upon that comparison, that the larger are an interpolation of the smaller, and not the smaller an epitome or abridgment of the larger. ... But whether the smaller themselves are the genuine writings of Ignatius, Bishop of Antioch, is a question that has been much disputed, and has employed the pens of the ablest critics. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature