Consanguineous marriage

Definition and stakes

George B. Louis Arner,  Consanguineous Marriages in the American Population

“ The best writers of the present day no longer recognize consanguinity as a cause per se, of idiocy. The heredity of neuroses, however, is so strongly established that few would dispute the proposition that where the morbidity is inherited through both parents it appears more frequently and in a more marked degree than where one parent is entirely free from taint. This is what occurs when a consanguineous marriage takes place between descendants of a neurotic family. ”
Source: Gutenberg

George B. Louis Arner,  Consanguineous Marriages in the American Population

“ By far the greater part of the literature of consanguineous marriage is of a controversial rather than of a scientific nature, and a search for statistical evidence for either side of the discussion reveals surprisingly little that is worthy of the name. Yet men of high scientific standing have repeatedly made most dogmatic assertions in regard to the results of such unions, and have apparently assumed that no proof was necessary. ”
Source: Gutenberg

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature