Federal judiciary

Definition and stakes

Jonathan Elliot,  Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution (1907)

“ It has not yet been denied that a federal judiciary is necessary to a certain extent. Every government necessarily involves a judiciary as a constituent part. If, then, a federal judiciary be necessary, what are the characters of its powers? That it shall be auxiliary to the federal government, support and maintain harmony between the United States and foreign powers, and between different states, and prevent a failure of justice in cases to which particular state courts are incompetent. ”
Source: Wikisource

Pamphlets on the Constitution of the United States

“ A choice of jurisdictions has been ever esteemed a valuable right, even where there are both of the same kind. The purpose of extending so far the jurisdiction of the federal judiciary, is to give every assurance to the general government, of a faithful execution of its laws, and to give citizens, states, and foreigners, an assurance of the impartial administration of justice. Without the salutary institution, the federal government might frequently be obstructed, and its servants want protection. ”
Source: Gutenberg

Portrait of Carl Schurz Carl Schurz,  State Rights: Reply to Criticism (1859)

“ The doctrine that the Federal Judiciary have exclusive jurisdiction of the cases enumerated in the Constitutional provision referred to has hardly ever been advocated. — Certainly would those, who claim for the Federal Supreme Court appellate jurisdiction over the State — Courts commit the grossest absurdity in claiming at the same time exclusive jurisdiction for the Federal Judiciary ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature