Intellectual disability, a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by limited cognitive and adaptive abilities, has traditionally been viewed through medical and legal perspectives. Scholars such as James Burt Miner have examined its broader societal impact, differentiating it from specific learning challenges, while Leta S. Hollingworth stressed the importance of distinguishing between isolated weaknesses and overall cognitive limitations.
Legal systems, including Thailand’s constitutional definition, highlight its social aspects, portraying it as an obstacle to full inclusion. Modern discussions, as observed by Lewis M. Terman, focus on assessing the degree of impairment and providing customized assistance, illustrating a move from a strictly medical to a more comprehensive, context-aware approach to the condition.