“ The State has never any object but to limit the individual, to tame him, to subordinate him, to subject him to something general; it lasts only so long as the individual is not all in all, and is only the clear-cut limitation of me, my limitedness, my slavery." [270] "A State never aims to bring about the free activity of individuals, but only that activity which is bound to the State's purpose." [271] "The State seeks to hinder every free activity by its censorship, its oversight, its police, and counts this hindering as its duty, because it is in truth a duty of self-preservation." ”
Paul Eltzbacher
Biographical details
Paul Eltzbacher (1868–1928), a German legal scholar and author, is renowned for his groundbreaking works on anarchism and his later support for National Bolshevism. His seminal text, Anarchism (1901), provided a structured examination of seven major anarchist thinkers, merging legal theory with critical insights into state authority and personal freedom.
Later, following Germany’s defeat in World War I, Eltzbacher dramatically transformed his political views, suggesting a partnership between Germany and the Soviet Union to create a socialist-nationalist fusion. His ideas, spread through Bolshevism and the German Future (1919), established him as an early proponent of National Bolshevism, a blend of authoritarianism and socialism. Eltzbacher’s career, characterized by intellectual transformation and vigorous debate, highlights his lasting impact on 20th-century political thought.
Quotes by Paul Eltzbacher
“ The union is my own creation, my creature, not sacred, not a spiritual power above my spirit, as little as any association of whatever sort. As I am not willing to be a slave to my maxims, but lay them bare to my constant criticism without any warrant, and admit no bail whatever for their continuance, so still less do I pledge myself to the union for my future and swear away my soul to it as men are said to do with the devil, and as is really the case with the State and all intellectual authority ”
“ If juries might at length cease to decide and be contented to invite, if force might gradually be withdrawn and reason trusted alone, shall we not one day find that juries themselves, and every other species of public institution, may be laid aside as unnecessary? Will not the reasonings of one wise man be as effectual as those of twelve? Will not the competence of one individual to instruct his neighbors be a matter of sufficient notoriety, without the formality of an election? Will there be many vices to correct and much obstinacy to conquer? ”
