Supreme Court of Korea Supreme Court Decision 2001Hu2801 Delivered on March 14… (2003)

Summary of Judgment The legal principle that an invention for which a patent is applied satisfies the requirement of industrial usability under the Patent Act even if it is possible to use the invention for industrial purposes only at the future date, but not at the patent application date, means merely that an industrial exploitation of the pertinent invention may take place in the future, and it does not include the case where the industrial usability arises for the first time in the future by advances of relevant technology.
Source: Wikisource

Supreme Court of Korea Supreme Court Decision 2000Hu3807 delivered on November 13… (2002)

Because one's trade name expresses one's identity, so long as a trade name is used in connection with a product only to the extent required to indicate one's business in customary ways, the effect of registration of an identical or similar trademark does not reach such trade name. On the other hand, if a name, title, or trade name is used in such a way as to conclude that it was used solely in order to distinguish one's own goods from someone else's goods, legal rights of another person's registered trademark take effect on such mark.
Source: Wikisource

Supreme Court of Korea Supreme Court Decision 2000Du9229 delivered on November 22… (2002)

In order for an administrative agency's refusal of a petition by a national to be an administrative disposition which can be subject to appeal, the act of the petition must be an exercise of public power or a comparable administrative action, the refusal must alter petitioner's legal relationship, and the national must have legal or logical standing to invoke an administrative action.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature