Summary

Portrait of Aristotle Aristotle Politics (Jowett) — Book I (1920)

The master is only the master of the slave; he does not belong to him, whereas the slave is not only the slave of his master, but wholly belongs to him. Hence we see what is the nature and office of a slave; he who is by nature not his own but another’s and yet a man, is by nature a slave; and he may be said to belong to another who, being a human being, is also a possession. And a possession may be defined as an instrument of action, separable from the possessor.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Aristotle Aristotle Politics (Jowett) — Book I (1920)

And doubtless if men differed from one another in the mere forms of their bodies as much as the statues of the Gods do from men, all would acknowledge that the inferior class should be slaves of the superior. And if there is a difference in the body, how much more in the soul? But the beauty of the body is seen, whereas the beauty of the soul is not seen. It is clear, then, that some men are by nature free, and others slaves, and that for these latter slavery is both expedient and right.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Aristotle Aristotle Politics (Jowett) — Book I (1920)

And, indeed, he who is rich in coin may often be in want of necessary food. But how can that be wealth of which a man may have a great abundance and yet perish with hunger, like Midas in the fable, whose insatiable prayer turned everything that was set before him into gold?
Distinction between natural wealth and the mere acquisition of coin. In the arts the means are limited by the end, the end is unlimited: so in money-making, but not in household management. Error of those who make wealth an end.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature