Charles Fortescue-Brickdale

Summary

Charles Fortescue-Brickdale 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 16… (1911)

Again, goods are very seldom the subject of a mortgage, whereas land has from time immemorial been the frequent subject of this class of transaction. Evidently, therefore, some sort of inquiry is necessary to enable a purchaser to obtain certainty that the land for which he pays full price is not subject to an unknown mortgage or charge which, if left undiscovered, might afterwards deprive him of a large part or even the whole of its value.
Source: Wikisource

Charles Fortescue-Brickdale 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 16… (1911)

Again, the probability of serious consequences to the purchaser ensuing from a mistake as to title is infinitely greater in the case of land than in the case of goods. Before the rightful owner can recover misappropriated goods, he has to find out where they are. This is usually a matter of considerable difficulty. By the time they have reached the hands of a bonâ fide purchaser all chance of their recovery by the true owner is practically at an end. But with land the case is far otherwise. A dispossessed rightful owner never has any difficulty in tracing his property, for it is immovable.
Source: Wikisource

Charles Fortescue-Brickdale 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 16… (1911)

The expediency of making inquiry into the vendor’s title before completing a purchase of land (and the case of a mortgage is precisely similar) is obvious. In the case of goods possession may ordinarily be relied on as proof of full ownership; in the case of land, the person in ostensible possession is very seldom the owner, being usually only a tenant, paying rent to someone else.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature