Summary

Esme Shepherd

“ Thanks for all your efforts Improvisatrice transclusion Hi, I was going through your transclusion. It seems that it does not conform to the convention here. You can compare with other works. For example:
The name of the work, as per title page, is The Improvisatrice and Other Poems; but you have named it Improvisatrice (L. E. L.) . I could not understand the reason. Title, printers, frontispiece, front, title page, advertisement, contents 1, contents 2 — this whole lot should be transcluded together. Is there any reason for separate transclusion, contrary to the custom here?
”
Source: Wikisource

Esme Shepherd

“ A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English) .
”
Source: Wikisource

Esme Shepherd

“ That should be Wikisource's objective also and it is particularly true of authors like Landon, who published in so many different outlets that after her death most of her poetry was lost and her stature as a poet was overlooked (or rather deliberately neglected) . So obviously we need to maintain this status quo. However, the files of extracted works at the moment begin with a title page that is mostly superfluous: that is, the title itself is the file name, so that isn't needed; naming myself as compiler was mere honesty and can be removed; and lastly an index, which is needed in some form. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature