Geoffrey Chaucer

Geoffrey Chaucer

Summary

Portrait of Geoffrey Chaucer Geoffrey Chaucer Chaucer's Works (ed. Skeat) Vol… (1900)

In fact, he and Tyrwhitt have unconsciously given us the view entertained, not by Chaucer, but by unthinking readers of the present age; a view which is not expressed, and was probably not intended. At the modern Stratford we may find Parisian French inefficiently taught; but at the ancient Stratford, the very important Anglo-French was taught efficiently enough. There is no parallel between the cases, nor any such jest as the modern journalist is never weary of, being encouraged by critics who ought to be more careful.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Geoffrey Chaucer Geoffrey Chaucer Chaucer's Works (ed. Skeat) Vol… (1900)

Chaucer, says Tyrwhitt, seems to consider all pilgrims to foreign parts as palmers. The essential difference between the two classes of persons here mentioned, the palmer and the pilgrim, was, that the latter had 'some dwelling-place, a palmer had none; the pilgrim travelled to some certain place, the palmer to all, and not to any one in particular; the pilgrim might go at his own charge, the palmer must profess wilful poverty; the pilgrim might give over his profession, the palmer must be constant'; Blount's Glossographia (taken from Speght) .
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Geoffrey Chaucer Geoffrey Chaucer Chaucer's Works (ed. Skeat) Vol… (1900)

The language of the King of England was quite as good, in the esteem of Chaucer's hearers, as that of the King of France; in fact, king Edward called himself king of France as well as of England, and king John was, at one time, merely his prisoner. Warton's note on the line is quite sane. He shews that queen Philippa wrote business letters in French (doubtless Anglo-French) with 'great propriety.' What Mr. Wright means by saying that 'it was similar to that used at a later period in the courts of law' is somewhat puzzling.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature