Summary

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone United States v. Lowden — Opinion of the Court

One must disregard the entire history of railroad labor relations in the United States to be able to say that the just and reasonable treatment of railroad employees in mitigation of the hardship imposed on them in carrying out the national policy of railway consolidation, has no bearing on the successful prosecution of that policy and no relationship to the maintenance of an adequate and efficient transportation system.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone United States v. Lowden — Opinion of the Court

To avoid interruption of transportation service an Emergency Board was invoked in 1929 under the Railway Labor Act of 1926, 45 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., to arbitrate the dispute between the railroad and the employees of the Texas & Pacific Railway Company. The Board awarded the employees compensation for loss from depreciation of the value of their homes (cf. Clause 4 in the order here involved) . The Board, after extensive hearings, found that such a requirement was reasonable in view of the fact that railroads themselves had on several prior occasions compensated the employees affected.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature