“ Abbey is still young, he is full of ideas and intentions, and the work he has done may, in view of his time of life, of his opportunities and the singular completeness of his talent, be regarded really as a kind of foretaste and prelude. It can hardly fail that he will do better things still, when everything is so favorable. Life itself is his subject, and that is always at his door. The only obstacle, therefore, that can be imagined in Mr. Abbey’s future career is a possible embarrassment as to what to choose. ”
Henry James
Summary
Published in 1893, Picture and Text is a collection of essays by Henry James examining the relationship between illustration and literature, with a focus on artists such as John Singer Sargent and Honoré Daumier. Originally intended as tributes to his friends at Harper and Brothers, the essays explore the harmony of word and image, applauding the delicacy of black-and-white engravings while criticizing modern stage design that overshadows performance.
Through portraits of illustrators like Charles Reinhart and Alfred Parsons, James contemplates artistic collaboration, the development of visual realism, and the conflict between technological progress and artistic authenticity. Though limited in scope, the work provides unique insights into James’s admiration for the integration of the arts and his thoughtful advocacy for Daumier’s underappreciated depth, securing its position as a notable contribution to literary and art criticism.
Quotes from Picture and Text (Henry James)
“ I feel tempted to say yes, when I think of the follies, the flatnesses, the affectations and stupidities that his teeming pencil has made vivid. But that vision immediately merges itself in another—a panorama of tall, pleasant, beautiful people, placed in becoming attitudes, in charming gardens, in luxurious rooms, so that I can scarcely tell which is the more definite, the impression satiric or the impression plastic. This I take to be a sign that Mr. Du Maurier knows how to be general and has a conception of completeness. The world amuses him, such queer things go on in it ”
“ There is a magnificent drawing of the series of “Le Public du Salon,” old classicists looking up, horrified and scandalized, at the new romantic work of 1830, in which the faces have an appalling gloom of mystification and platitude. We feel that Daumier reproduces admirably the particular life that he sees, because it is the very medium in which he moves. He has no wide horizon; the absolute bourgeois hems him in, and he is a bourgeois himself, without poetic ironies, to whom a big cracked mirror has been given. His thick, strong, manly touch stands, in every way, for so much knowledge. ”
