Summary

John Bruce MacCallum On the mechanism of the physiological action of the cathartics (1906)

In such a complicated organ as the intestine there are many sources of error, and differences of opinion may readily arise if an attempt is made to analyze too closely the functions of the various tissues making up the intestine, to decide for example whether the movements are of nervous origin or muscular, or whether the secretion is dependent primarily on the blood supply or on the nervous system.
Source: Gutenberg

John Bruce MacCallum On the mechanism of the physiological action of the cathartics (1906)

The amount of fluid which may be secreted by a loop of intestine isolated from the body is limited by the absence of the blood supply. The loop, as shown above, secretes a certain amount of fluid in the first 10 or 20 minutes. If it is then emptied, usually no more fluid appears. The quantity secreted depends on the amount of fluid contained in the intestinal walls at the time of its removal from the body. No fluid passes from the solution in which the loop is suspended into the lumen of the loop; no current is established through the walls from the outside inwards.
Source: Gutenberg

John Bruce MacCallum On the mechanism of the physiological action of the cathartics (1906)

Bottazzi [20] has recently found that an extract of the small intestine injected into the blood causes not only an increase in the fluid secreted into the intestine, but also an increase in the peristaltic movements. This extract is an aqueous one, the nucleoproteids being precipitated by acetic acid. It thus contains the secretin of Bayliss and Starling and is capable of increasing also the pancreatic secretion. The fluid produced in the intestine was later analyzed by Bottazzi and Gabrieli [21] and proved to be quite similar to the normal intestinal secretion.
Source: Gutenberg

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature