Summary

Portrait of Joseph Rucker Lamar Joseph Rucker Lamar Mitchell Coal Coke Company v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company…

Has the Constitution any greater regard for the right of a carrier to trial by jury than it has for the right of a shipper? Conceding, as I do, that Congress could not, because of the 5th Amendment, make the finding of an administrative body, acting without jury trial, final as against the carrier, I submit, with great respect, that it gives an unconstitutional meaning to the act if we construe it as depriving the shipper of his remedy without trial by jury.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Joseph Rucker Lamar Joseph Rucker Lamar Mitchell Coal Coke Company v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company…

It seems to me erroneous to conclude that, because the things that a court must do in order to pass judgment upon a past transaction respecting the rates or practices of a carrier are like the things that a commission or a committee or other administrative or legislative body must do in order to perform their proper functions respecting present management and future regulation, therefore all investigations into the past practices or rates of a carrier are administrative or legislative.
Legislation consists in laying down laws or rules for the future.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Joseph Rucker Lamar Joseph Rucker Lamar Mitchell Coal Coke Company v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company…

Equally obvious is it that the existence of such a power in the courts, independent of prior action by the Commission, would lead to favoritism, to the enforcement of one rate in one jurisdiction and a different one in another, would destroy the prohibitions against preferences and discrimination, and afford, moreover, a ready means by which, through collusive proceedings, the wrongs which the statute was intended to remedy could be successfully inflicted.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature