“ Atonement, after punishment, is surely a superfluity. Or was the atonement only for those who needed no atonement, having no part in the offence? Did the sacrifice of Jesus serve as atonement for the whole world, and, if yes, for all sin, or for Adam’s sin only? If the atonement is for the whole world, does it extend to unbelievers as well as to believers in the efficacy? if it only includes believers, then what has become of those generations who, according to the Bible, for 4,000 years succeeded each other in the world without faith in Christ because without knowledge of his mission? ”
Summary
Theological Essays, an anonymous work from the 19th century, critically examines Christian doctrine, exploring themes of divinity, heresy, and the ethical consequences of faith. Focusing on figures such as Jesus, Abraham, and Jacob, it probes the essence of the Divine, the effectiveness of redemption, and the inconsistencies within biblical stories.
The essays challenge conventional beliefs, questioning eternal punishment, the function of the Religious Tract Society, and the reconciliation of monotheism with human suffering. Through incisive reasoning and critical inquiry, the text presents itself as a counter to dogma, promoting rational scrutiny of religious matters and the emancipation of humanity from restrictive theological structures.
Quotes from Theological Essays ()
“ It can scarcely be necessary to argue to the citizens of the United States of America that the origin of their liberties was in the rejection of faith in the divine right of George III.Will any one, save the most bigoted, contend that it is not certain gain to humanity to spread unbelief in the terrible doctrine that eternal torment is the probable fate of the great majority of the human family? Is it not gain to have diminished the faith that it was the duty of the wretched and the miserable to be content with the lot in life which providence had awarded them? ”
“ This history of an earth-born Deity, descended through a crime-tainted ancestry, and whose genealogical tree is traced through one who was not his father; this history of an infinite God nursed as a baby, growing through childhood to manhood like any frail specimen of humanity; this history, garnished with bedevilled men, enchanted fig tree, myriads of ghosts, and scores of miracles, and by such garnishment made more akin to an oriental romance than to a sober history; this picture of the infinite invisible spirit incarnate visible as man; immutability subject to human passions and infirmities ”
