Summary

Portrait of Thomas Henry Huxley Thomas Henry Huxley The Crayfish: An Introduction to the Study of Zoology

However, apart from the philosophical worthlessness of the hypothesis of creation, it would be a waste of time to discuss a view which no one upholds. And, unless I am greatly mistaken, at the present day, no one possessed of knowledge sufficient to give his opinion importance is prepared to maintain that the ancestors of the various species of crayfish were fabricated out of inorganic matter, or brought from nothingness into being, by a creative fiat.
Our only refuge, therefore, appears to be the hypothesis of evolution.
Source: Gutenberg

Portrait of Thomas Henry Huxley Thomas Henry Huxley The Crayfish: An Introduction to the Study of Zoology

The analogy of a machine that, sooner or later, must be brought to a standstill by the wear and tear of its parts, does not hold, inasmuch as the animal mechanism is continually renewed and repaired; and, though it is true that individual components of the body are constantly dying, yet their places are taken by vigorous successors. A city remains, notwithstanding the constant death-rate of its inhabitants; and such an organism as a crayfish is only a corporate unity, made up of innumerable partially independent individualities.
Source: Gutenberg

Portrait of Thomas Henry Huxley Thomas Henry Huxley The Crayfish: An Introduction to the Study of Zoology

Probably the most conspicuous peculiarity of the crayfish, to any one who is familiar only with the higher animals, is the fact that the hard parts of the body are outside and the soft parts inside; whereas in ourselves, and in the ordinary domestic animals, the hard parts, or bones, which constitute the skeleton, are inside, and the soft parts clothe them. Hence, while our hard framework is said to be an endoskeleton, or internal skeleton; that of the crayfish is termed an exoskeleton, or external skeleton.
Source: Gutenberg

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature