Summary

Thomas Woody Early Quaker education in Pennsylvania (1920)

Like Benezet, he regarded education as a social duty, both to each individual and to the community of individuals. This duty could not be performed [34] by immoral tutors and schoolmasters, for the pupil could be made to rise no higher than the master; so the result would be an immoral society. [99] The responsibility, in the last analysis, for the right conduct of schools falls upon the parents. If they are indifferent, nothing can be accomplished for the schools, for the whole community is no better or more insistent in its demands than the individuals constituting it.
Source: Gutenberg

Thomas Woody Early Quaker education in Pennsylvania (1920)

In a study of education among the Quakers it is desirable, if not absolutely imperative, to go back to the origin of the society and note, at least in part, the tenets of the society and the reasons for its foundation. For this purpose the best materials are to be found in the life and works of George Fox, the founder of the Society of Quakers. It would, perhaps, be unnecessary at present to make any considerable study of beliefs or tenets, if it were not for the fact that, in times past, some of the expressions of their belief have been misconstrued.
Source: Gutenberg

Thomas Woody Early Quaker education in Pennsylvania (1920)

The experiences of Benezet in the school work were of most pleasant nature. Not only by his own statement, but judged also by the accounts given in his memoirs by Robert Vaux, it seems that he was unusually kind and sympathetic as a master, which won him the greatest respect of his pupils. [95] The tasks of schoolteaching are only unpleasant when being performed merely for the sake of the wage obtained. Those who attempt to teach large numbers for the sake of a large income find it disagreeable; they form the class of teachers against whom he would discriminate.
Source: Gutenberg

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature