Walter W. Skeat

Summary

Walter W. Skeat Alexander and Dindimus (1878)

But the spelling of proper names is very corrupt in nearly all writings of the 14th century, and it is quite unnecessary to suppose that such a misspelling is to be laid upon the scribe. Even in the best MSS. of Chaucer, such names assume very singular forms, and we have no ground for supposing that the case would have been any different if Chaucer had written out his poems himself. Hence all such forms are best left as they stand, though it often happens that we can interpret them correctly by seeing through the disguise. Even in the Latin texts the spellings differ.
Source: Wikisource

Walter W. Skeat Alexander and Dindimus (1878)

As to the phrase, it is an imitation of the common M.E. many kinnes thinges, i.e. things of many a kind; a phrase which has been twisted into the modern form 'many a kind of thing' by a complete inversion of the form of construction. So also we have alles kinnes thinges, things of every kind, corrupted to 'every kind of thing;' and again, what kinnes thinges, things of what kind, or 'what kind of thing.' See further in the note to Piers Plowman C.xi.128. See also note to the same, B.xviii.298, for another example of don in the sense of 'make;' where, moreover, the gen. form dones is used.
Source: Wikisource

Walter W. Skeat Alexander and Dindimus (1878)

Bisse, pp. 98, 99.
1042. The reading helpe is absurd, and obviously corrupt; the word meant is plainly yyelpe, i.e. boast. And the mis-writing of the word is easily accounted for, as the scribe's eye must have caught the last word of the next line, viz. hele.
1046. Perhaps corrupt. The stress of the alliteration falls upon for, which is not good; and the word sorw is suspicious. As it stands, it means—'And ye endeavour, with sorrow, to (make) your false gods hear;' and, even so, teh construction is strained.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature