Bankruptcy Code

Definition and stakes

Supreme Court of the United States,  Bartenwerfer v. Buckley (2023)

“ The same Congress that “champion [ed] ” the fresh start could not also have shackled honest debtors with liability for frauds that they did not personally commit. Brief for Petitioner 37.
This argument earns credit for color but not much else. To begin, it characterizes the Bankruptcy Code as focused on the unadulterated pursuit of the debtor’s interest. But the Code, like all statutes, balances multiple, often competing interests. Section 523 is a case in point: Barring certain debts from discharge necessarily reflects aims distinct from wiping the bankrupt’s slate clean.
”
Source: Wikisource

by the United States government,  United States Code — Title 11, Chapter 1…

“ First, the limitation on the power of a bankruptcy judge (the power to enjoin a court being reserved to the district judge) is removed as inconsistent with the increased powers and jurisdiction of the new bankruptcy court. Second, the bankruptcy judge is prohibited from appointing a receiver in a case under title 11 under any circumstances. The bankruptcy code has ample provision for the appointment of a trustee when needed. Appointment of a receiver would simply circumvent the established procedures. ”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Paul Stevens John Paul Stevens,  Hoffman v. Connecticut Department Of Income Maintenance…

“ The drafters of the Bankruptcy Code were well aware of the value to the bankruptcy administration process of a waiver of federal and state sovereign immunity. In 1973, five years before the Code was enacted, the Commission on the Bankruptcy Laws of the United States proposed a broad waiver of sovereign immunity under which every provision of the proposed bankruptcy bill would apply to the States. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature