David Hackett Souter, Yates v. Evatt — Opinion of the Court
“ In light of the fact that the Supreme Court of South Carolina has approved the trial judge's jury instructions, we will accept his charge on malice as the proper statement of South Carolina law on the subject. The trial judge told the jury that malice is the equivalent of an "intention to kill," without legal justification or excuse. [13] There is no question that either presumption on malice could have been employed by the jury in reaching its verdict. ”
