William O. Douglas,
Interstate Commerce Commission v…
“ We agree. We also agree that though common carrier service is reasonably adequate and though another carrier is willing and able to furnish the service, a permit to a contract carrier to furnish this particular service still might be wholly consistent with the national transportation policy defined in the Act. For it is 'the distinct need of each individual customer' that the contract carrier is designed to fill. § 203 (a) (15) . And 'the changing character' of the shipper's 'requirements' is a factor to be weighed before denying the application. ”
