Double jeopardy

Definition and stakes

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas,  Brock v. North Carolina — Dissent

“ That point of view should shape our conception of double jeopardy and due process of law. Once the prosecution can call a halt in the middle of a trial in order to await a more favorable time, or to find new evidence, or to make up the deficiencies in the testimony of its witnesses, the promise of protection against double jeopardy loses the great force it was thought to have when the Constitution was written. ”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black,  United States Marcus v. Hess — Opinion of the Court

“ The short of it is that where two such proceedings merely carry out the remedies which Congress has prescribed in advance for a wrong, they do not twice put a man in jeopardy for the same offense. Congress thereby merely allows the comprehensive penalties which it has imposed to be enforced in separate suits instead of in a single proceeding. By doing this Congress does not impose more than a single punishment. And the double jeopardy clause does not prevent Congress from prescribing such a procedure for the vindication of punitive remedies. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature