Harper's Weekly

Biographical details

Harper's Weekly,  Harper's Weekly Editorials on Carl Schurz…

“ We have pledged our word to them as solemnly as we pledge it to any people, and there are Americans who urge us to spurn our own word as a mere dicer's oath. But if Indians are vermin, what business have we to bind ourselves to them by pledges? If we mean to treat them as we find most convenient for our advantage at different times, but still to refuse them citizenship or the protection of law, would not a policy of extermination be more charitable for them, and less degrading and demoralizing for ourselves? They are, indeed, a poor and ignorant remnant of a people. ”
Source: Wikisource

Harper's Weekly,  Harper's Weekly Editorials on Carl Schurz…

“ But a great war is not a question of two men; and even if it were, and both the King of Prussia and the Emperor of France were alike despots, which of two despots is to be the more condemned, he who involves two nations in all the horrors of war, or he who removes the alleged pretext for those horrors? It seems to be forgotten that it is not a question of quarrel between kings only, but of war between nations. Granting that liberty gains nothing by the war, does humanity lose nothing. ”
Source: Wikisource

Harper's Weekly,  Harper's Weekly Editorials on Carl Schurz…

“ Can there be any doubt that the Continental Congress and General Washington would have retorted that, no matter what the French King might have bought, Great Britain had no sovereignty left to sell; that least of all would the Americans permit themselves to be sold; that the French, in so treating their American allies after such high-sounding professions of friendship and generosity, were a lot of mean, treacherous, contemptible hypocrites, and that the Americans would rather die than submit to such wolves in sheep's clothing? ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature