Summary

Francis Henry Butler 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 13… (1911)

Though Pott, indeed, had perceived that the only true system of surgery is that which most closely accords with the curative efforts of nature, a rational pathology can hardly be said to have had at this time any existence; and it was generally assumed that a knowledge of anatomy alone was a sufficient foundation for the study of surgery. Hunter, unlike his contemporaries, to most of whom his philosophic habit of thought was a mystery, and whose books contained little else than relations of cases and modes of treatment, sought the reason for each phenomenon that came under his notice.
Source: Wikisource

Francis Henry Butler 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 13… (1911)

Neither a material nor a chemical theory of life, however, formed a part of Hunter’s creed. “Mere composition of matter,” he remarked, “does not give life; for the dead body has all the composition it ever had; life is a property we do not understand; we can only see the necessary leading steps towards it.” [37] As from life only, said he in one of his lectures, we can gain an idea of death, so from death only we gain an idea of life.
Source: Wikisource

Francis Henry Butler 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 13… (1911)

The scope of Hunter’s labours may be defined as the explication of the various phases of life exhibited in organized structures, both animal and vegetable, from the simplest to the most highly differentiated. By him, therefore, comparative anatomy was employed, not in subservience to the classification of living forms, as by Cuvier, but as a means of gaining insight into the principle animating and producing these forms, by virtue of which he perceived that, however different in form and faculty, they were all allied to himself. In what does life consist?
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature