Summary

Friedrich Rathgen The Preservation of Antiquities…

If in some cases it may be uncertain whether the destruction of antiquities of limestone or earthenware has been due to mechanical or to chemical influences, this uncertainty is excluded in the case of metallic objects, of which those of bronze and iron chiefly come under the notice of the antiquary.
From the first piece of metallic iron which he possessed man must have soon become acquainted with its untoward property of rusting, but even at the present day opinions differ as to the origin of rust, and the cause of its rapid spreading.
Source: Gutenberg

Friedrich Rathgen The Preservation of Antiquities…

My own opinion is that the only patina which is really stable is that which consists of combinations of oxygen, hydrogen and carbonic acid with the metal, somewhat similar to those analysed by Schuler (see page 24) , and by Arche and Hassack (see page 27) . The presence of sulphides, and even of sulphates, does not seem to be injurious.
If a patina is to deserve the name of a good, sound, or, as it is termed, a “noble” patina (Edel-patina) , the original [35] contours of the bronze with all its markings must be distinctly visible.
Source: Gutenberg

Friedrich Rathgen The Preservation of Antiquities…

In one place objects are found covered with a slight layer of rust only, in another with a thicker layer, in another there remains but a small core of metal, or even none at all, or the layer of rust may be intermingled with particles of earth or clay. The rust may be uniform in colour and hardness in one case, and in another soft areas, generally light in colour, may alternate with darker, harder patches, while frequently the harder layer is found below the lighter and softer, etc.—conditions which depend on the occurrence of the various iron compounds.
Source: Gutenberg

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature