Henry Billings Brown

Henry Billings Brown

Summary

Portrait of Henry Billings Brown Henry Billings Brown Hobbs v. Beach (180 U.S. 383)…

Indeed, a model of the Dennis and York machine so altered was put in evidence, and shown to be capable of doing the work of the Beach patent, though somewhat crudely and imperfectly. It is insisted that, as the only material change in the Dennis and York machine is the substitution of dies with diverging faces for the flat head and platen of that structure, this involves no invention, and that it would at once occur to a mechanic of ordinary skill.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Henry Billings Brown Henry Billings Brown Hobbs v. Beach (180 U.S. 383)…

The Horton machine not only accomplishes the same result as the Beach device, but accomplishes it by the employment of the same combination of the same elements. The mere fact that the continuous strip is introduced between the dies from a different direction is immaterial. The fact that the Horton device contains no mechanism for turning the strip into the inside of the corner merely indicates that it does not perform all the functions of the Beach patent.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Henry Billings Brown Henry Billings Brown Hobbs v. Beach (180 U.S. 383)…

While the mere introduction of springs to enable the plunger to act with an elastic pressure may not of itself have been a novelty, its introduction into a machine which was itself novel certainly did not destroy its novel character. The claim does not cover simply a die constructed in this manner; but the elastic feature introduced into one of opposing clamping dies, having diverging working faces, constructed to cooperate in pressing an adhesive stay-strip upon an interposed box-corner, was clearly novel
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature