Summary

National Transportation Safety Board Railroad accident report—Derailment of Southern Pacific Transportation Company freight train on May 12… (1990)

A motorist who routinely travels on a highway that parallels the railroad tracks for some distance and normally sees trains at that time of the morning testified that she observed "...one train...going a lot faster than some I had normally seen before." The motorist, who estimated that the highway was about 1⁄4 to 1⁄2 mile from the tracks, also testified that the train was engulfed in what she assumed to be smoke, which she described as light blue in color. The helper brakeman testified that after the helper engineer placed the brakes in emergency.
Source: Wikisource

National Transportation Safety Board Railroad accident report—Derailment of Southern Pacific Transportation Company freight train on May 12… (1990)

Communication Between Head-end and Helper Engineers.—On the day of the train derailment, there were no requirements that the head-end engineer and helper engineer communicate with each other regarding the condition of their respective locomotive units. Both the road foreman of engines and the general road foreman of engines testified that based on their review of the radio transcripts between the head-end engineer and the helper engineer on the day of the derailment, the amount of communication that took place was less than what they would have expected.
Source: Wikisource

National Transportation Safety Board Railroad accident report—Derailment of Southern Pacific Transportation Company freight train on May 12… (1990)

The Office of Pipeline Safety required Calnev to fully uncover and visually inspect the pipelines for possible damage and then required Calnev to hydrostatically test the pipelines through the area of the derailment. The Office of Pipeline Safety advised the Safety Board that it had established as a policy that pipelines potentially damaged by a derailment would be both visually examined and subjected to a hydrostatic test before they could be returned to service, if OPS believes there is potential for harm to life or property.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature