The American Historical Review
“ If there is any habit of thought more dangerous than that of antithetical exposition—for who of us really knows enough to set reality in contradictories?—it is that of constantly questioning whether this or that fact is the more important. To ask whether the individual or society is more important is like asking whether the oak or the acorn is primary. Historical situations must be viewed synthetically, not analytically. The first two lectures on the Limits within which the Spiritual Interpretation is Possible, and on Spiritual Tendencies in History as a Whole, seem somewhat perfunctory. ”
