Dacians

Definition and stakes

1911 Encyclopædia Britannica (1911)

“ The Dacians are often mentioned under Augustus, according to whom they were compelled to recognize the Roman supremacy. But they were by no means subdued, and in later times seized every opportunity of crossing the frozen Danube and ravaging the province of Moesia. From A.D. 85 to 89 the Dacians were engaged in two wars with the Romans, under Duras or Diurpaneus, and the great Decebalus, who ruled from 86–87 to 107. After two severe reverses, the Romans, under Tettius Julianus, gained a signal advantage, but were obliged to make peace owing to the defeat of Domitian by the Marcomanni. ”
Source: Wikisource

1911 Encyclopædia Britannica (1911)

“ But the Dacians were really left independent, as is shown by the fact that Domitian agreed to purchase immunity from further Dacian inroads by the payment of an annual tribute.
To put an end to this disgraceful arrangement, Trajan resolved to crush the Dacians once and for all. The result of his first campaign (101–102) was the occupation of the Dacian capital Sarmizegethusa (Várhely) and the surrounding country; of the second (105–107) , the suicide of Decebalus, the conquest of the whole kingdom and its conversion into a Roman province.
”
Source: Wikisource

Harvard Classics Volume 28

“ In this view, the modern Roumans would be the descendants of Trajan's colonists and of Dacians who had learned of them to adopt the speech and manners of Rome. But when we remember that Dacia was the first Roman province to be given up—that the modern Roumania was for ages the highway of every barbarian tribe on its way from the East to the West—that the land has been conquered and settled and forsaken over and over again—it would be passing strange if this should be the one land, and its people the one race, to keep the Latin tongue when it has been forgotten in all the neighboring countries. ”
Source: Gutenberg

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature