French invasion of England

Definition and stakes

Various The Continental Monthly, Vol. 5…

No future accession of territory would make France more formidable for the invasion of England than she is now. Her army of five hundred thousand men, and her steam navy and ironclads are all-sufficient for that purpose, whenever the French emperor chooses so to employ them. But if Napoleon devotes this army and that navy to such a formidable conquest as that of a country seven times as large as France, three thousand miles from her shores, it is not probable that he will soon be able to spare them for the invasion of Great Britain.
Source: Gutenberg

Charles Robert Leslie Fletcher A School History of England (1911)

But most nations, even those that really were badly governed, soon found out that a French invasion was much worse than any amount of bad government by their own ‘tyrants’. So nation after nation rose and fought against France, either one by one or in great alliances of nations. All were beaten; France was the greatest land power in the world, and her soldiers the bravest, cleverest and fiercest fighters. All the nations in the world appealed to England to help them with the one thing which all knew she had got in heaps, money.
Source: Wikisource

Various The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 04…

An invasion of England can never be safely undertaken except by some power that is master of the seas; and England is not in the least disposed to abandon her maritime supremacy. There would have to be a Battle of Actium before her shores could be in danger, and she must have lost it; and no matter what is said concerning the excellence of the French navy, that of England is as much ahead of it in all the elements of real, enduring strength, as it has been at any other period of the history of the two countries.
Source: Gutenberg

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature