Riot Act

Definition and stakes

Various,  The Great Round World and What Is Going On In It…

“ When a riot has assumed such a serious character that armed men have had to be called out to subdue it, the Riot Act is generally read, and then the soldiers or sheriff's deputies charge the mob, being careful not to fire on them or wound them unless necessary in self-defence or in performance of their duty.
In this instance the sheriff utterly misunderstood the rioters, and as they crowded around him, trying to make out what it was that he was reading to them, he lost his self-control, and imagining the men were defying and threatening him, ordered his posse to fire.
”
Source: Gutenberg

Jonathan Elliot,  Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution (1907)

“ A government leaving it to a man to do his duty or not, as he pleases, would be a new species of government, or rather no government at all. The ingenuity of the gentleman is remarkable in introducing the riot act of Great Britain. That act has no connection, or analogy, to any regulation of the militia; nor is there any thing in the Constitution to warrant the general government to make such an act. It never was a complaint, in Great Britain, that the militia could be called forth. If riots should happen, the militia are proper to quell it, to prevent a resort to another mode. ”
Source: Wikisource

Camden Pelham,  The Chronicles of Crime or The New Newgate Calendar…

“ The real circumstances of the case may be said to be unsettled even to this day; and while the magistrates and their friends declare that, the Riot Act having been read, the subsequent proceedings on the part of the soldiery were both justified and necessary, the friends of the people as invariably deny the allegation of the reading of the Riot Act, and therefore{33} contend, that the introduction of a military force was harsh and unconstitutional. ”
Source: Gutenberg

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature