Obscenity law

Definition and stakes

Portrait of William J. Brennan William J. Brennan,  Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton… (1973)

“ The concepts involved are said to be so elusive and the laws so inherently unenforceable without extravagant expenditures of time and effort by enforcement officers and the courts that basic reassessment is not only wise but essential." United States v. Reidel, 402 U.S., at 357.
Nevertheless, we concluded that "the task of restructuring the obscenity laws lies with those who pass, repeal, and amend statutes and ordinances." Ibid. But the law of obscenity has been fashioned by this Court--and necessarily so under our duty to enforce the Constitution.
”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas,  Memoirs v. Massachusetts — Concurrence

“ On the basis of these few cases, one cannot say that the common-law doctrines with regard to publication of obscenity were anything but uncertain. 'There is no definition of the term. There is no basis of identification. There is no unity in describing what is obscene literature, or in prosecuting it. There is little more than the ability to smell it.' Alpert, Judicial Censorship of Obscene Literature, 52 Harv.L.Rev. ”
Source: Wikisource

Cockburn, C.J., Blackburn, Mellor, and Lush, J.J.,  Regina v. Hicklin (1868)

“ But it is not to be said, because there are in many standard and established works objectionable passages, that therefore the law is not as alleged on the part of this prosecution, namely, that obscene works are the subject-matter of indictment; and I think the test of obscenity is this, whether the tendency of the matter charged as obscenity is to deprave and corrupt those whose minds are open to such immoral influences, and into whose hands a publication of this sort may fall. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature