Summary

Hope Waddell Hogg 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 18… (1911)

The mystery of the Hyksos has not yet been solved; but it is not impossible that they had relations with Mesopotamia. After they had been driven out of Egypt (q.v.) , when Aḥmōse, the officer of Tethmosis (Thutmose) I., mentions Naharin (late 16th century) , he does not say anything about the inhabitants. He seems to imply, however, that there was more than one state. The first mention of Mitanni, as we saw, is under Tethmosis III., who clearly crossed the Euphrates. It is at least possible that common enmity to Mitanni led to a treaty with Assyria (under Ashur-nadin-akhe) .
Source: Wikisource

Hope Waddell Hogg 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 18… (1911)

Ḥarrān was clearly closely associated with Asshur in the rights and institutions that were the subject of so much party struggle in the new Assyrian empire that began with Tiglath-pileser IV. (see Babylonia and Assyria) . When the policy of transporting people from one part of the empire to another was developed, new elements were introduced into Mesopotamia, amongst them Israelites, of whom perhaps traces have been found in the neighbourhood of Ḥarrān at Kannu’.
Source: Wikisource

Hope Waddell Hogg 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 18… (1911)

Knowing what we know of the colonizing power of the Assyrians, we may assume that among the “Mitanni” and other elements in the Mesopotamian population there would now be an increase of people of “Assyrian” origin. On the tangled politics of this period, especially Mesopotamia’s relations with the north-west, the Boghaz-Keui documents may be expected to throw a great deal of light. We know already a little more of the chequered history of the Amorites in the Naharin district, beset by great powers on three sides. When Mitanni fell Babylon no doubt adhered to its older claims on Mesopotamia
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature