Mahlon Pitney, Eisner v. Macomber — Opinion of the Court
“ Can a stock dividend, considering its essential character, be brought within the definition? To answer this, regard must be had to the nature of a corporation and the stockholder's relation to it. We refer, of course, to a corporation such as the one in the case at bar, organized for profit, and having a capital stock divided into shares to which a nominal or par value is attributed.Certainly the interest of the stockholder is a capital interest, and his certificates of stock are but the evidence of it. ”
