Linguistic purity

Definition and stakes

Elizabeth Mary Wright,  Rustic Speech and Folk-Lore

“ My aim in dealing with the linguistic side of my subject has been to show that rules for pronunciation and syntax are not the monopoly of educated people who have been taught to preach as well as practise them. Dialect-speaking people obey sound-laws and grammatical rules even more faithfully than we do, because theirs is a natural and unconscious obedience. ”
Source: Gutenberg

Ralcy Husted Bell,  The Mystery of Words (1924)

“ Too often the idea of the purity of a tongue is purely a matter of prejudice. A foreign word that is needed—one that is fit—one that adds to the powers, the subtleties of expression, to the readiness of understanding, to the utility, or to the beauty of a language, should be introduced into that language without affectation or reserve.
One disadvantage of adopting foreign words is owing to the absence of the time-factor. Words of the best kind are old enough to have acquired associations in the thought of the folk using them.
”
Source: Wikisource

John Hendricks Bechtel,  Slips of Speech : a Helpful Book for Everyone Who Aspires to Correct the Everyday Errors of Speaking

“ An author’s diction is pure when he uses such words only as belong to the idiom of the language. The only standard of purity is the practice of the best writers and speakers. A violation of purity is called a barbarism.
Unlike the Latin, Greek, or Hebrew, the English is a living language, and, like all living organisms, manifests its life by taking in new material and casting off old waste continually. Science, art, and philosophy give rise to new ideas which, in turn, demand new words for their expression.
”
Source: Gutenberg

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature